OBOF TYMHM & MORE PART 14-14

 

WELCOME TO OPINIONS  BASED  ON FACTS (OBOF)

&

THINGS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED (TYMHM)

YEAR ONE

YEAR TWO

YEAR THREE

YEAR FOUR

 

OBOF YEAR FOUR INDEX
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-01	Jan. 02, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-02	Jan. 09, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-03	Jan. 15, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-04	Jan. 24, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-05	JAN 30, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-06	Feb. 06, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-06 EXTRA	Feb. 09, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-07	Feb. 13, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-08	Feb. 21, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-09	Feb. 27, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-10	Mar. 08, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-11	Mar. 13, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-11    EXTRA	Mar. 15, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-12	Mar.  21, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-13	Mar.  29, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-14	Apr.   03, 2014

 

Agenda

 

1.  Boehner took care of Doctors, how about the jobless?

2.  When Obamacare was doomed.

3.  Who are the Koch Brothers

 

 

 

 

 

Boehner Bent Over Backwards for

Docs.  Now How About for the Jobless?

 

Bill Scher

Campaign for America’s Future / Op-Ed

Published: Saturday 29 March 2014

 

When Speaker John Boehner really wants to get something done, he gets it done.

If Congress did not act before Tuesday, doctors would face a 24 percent cut in their Medicare reimbursement rates. With the Senate yet to act, Boehner did not have any time to spare. But going through traditional procedures takes time and a faster process requires hard-to-reach supermajority support.

And since averting the cuts increases the budget deficit and would violate the recent budget agreement, Boehner needed a bill that would offset the costs.  Over at the Senate, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has been trying to craft a permanent solution satisfactory to doctors, but he has struggled to find a cost offset that would satisfy both parties.

What’s a speaker to do?

First, grab an accounting gimmick to mask the cost of bigger reimbursements for a year.

 

Second, wait until there aren’t many people in the House chamber.

 

And then, hold a quick voice vote.

Voila! EGG Here’s your legislation.

Maybe all that’s a little loosey-goosey with the spirit of House rules, but hey, doctors were in trouble.  Boehner did what he had to do.

 

It’s nice to know how far Boehner will go to stretch House procedure in the name of helping people in need, since today the Senate is expected to pass bipartisan legislation to temporarily reinstate jobless aid for the long-term unemployed, and retroactively pay benefits from January when the program lapsed.

If Boehner cares as much about the long-term unemployed as he does doctors, he will happily accept the cost offset agreed upon by Senate Republican and Democratic negotiators.

And not only will he put the bill on the floor, he will rush it through while conservatives are out eating lunch by scheduling another quick voice vote.

IF you are not convinced Boehner cares about the jobless as he does the doctors, then he may need some additional encouragement.

Click here to call your House representative to demand the House pass the Senate bill extending long-term unemployment insurance.

~~~

When Obamacare Was ‘Doomed’

 

By E. J. Dionne

April 3, 2014 12:00 am

 

WASHINGTON — Is there any accountability in American politics for being completely wrong?  Is there any cost to those who say things that turn out not to be true and then, when their fabrications or false predictions are exposed, calmly move on to concocting new claims as if they had never made the old ones?

The fact that the Affordable Care Act hit its original goal this week of signing up more than 7 million people through its insurance exchanges ought to be a moment of truth — literally as well as figuratively.  It ought to give everyone, particularly members of the news media, pause over how reckless the opponents of change have been in making instant judgments and outlandish charges.

When the health care website went haywire last fall, conservatives were absolutely certain this technological failure meant that the entire reform effort was doomed.  If you doubt this, try a Google search keyed to that period relating the word “doomed” to the health care law.

It should be said that the general public was much wiser. A CNN poll in November that Washington Post blogger Greg Sargent highlighted at the time found a majority (54 percent to 45 percent) saying that the problems facing the law “will eventually be solved.”  Political moderates took this view by 55 percent to 43 percent, independents by 50 percent to 48 percent. Only Republicans — by a whopping 72 percent to 27 percent — and conservatives (by 66-33) thought the law could never be fixed.

Their representatives in Washington, moderate conservatives as well as the Tea Party’s loyalists, followed the base’s lead. In mid-November, for example, Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) told Fox News flatly that the law is “destined to fail,” “fundamentally flawed” and “not ready for prime time.”  House Speaker John Boehner predicted dire outcomes before the website fiasco. He repeatedly insisted, as he did in July, that “even the Obama administration knows the train wreck will only get worse.”

This attitude affected more neutral observers.  Forbes magazine posted a piece on Nov. 22, 2013, under the headline: “What to do if and when Obamacare collapses.” The op-ed modestly acknowledged that “it’s too soon to write an epitaph for Obamacare,” but then barged forward, since “its crises are piling up so fast that one has to begin looking ahead.”

At this point, the etiquette of commentary typically requires a “to be sure” paragraph, as in: To be sure, the law could still face other problems, blah, blah, blah.  But such paragraphs are timid and often insincere hedges.  After all, every successful program, even well-established ones such as Medicare, Social Security and food stamps, confronts ongoing challenges.

So let’s say it out loud: The ACA is doing exactly what its supporters said it would do.  It is getting health insurance to millions (right now, it looks like around 10 million) who didn’t have it before.  And it’s working especially well in places such as Kentucky, where state officials threw themselves fully and competently behind the cause of signing up the uninsured. Those who want to repeal the law will have to admit that they are willing to deprive these people, or some large percentage of them, of insurance.

Too many conservatives would prefer not to say upfront what they really believe: They don’t want the federal government to spend the significant sums of money needed to get everyone covered.  Admitting this can sound cruel, so they insist that their objections are to the ACA’s alleged unworkability, or to “a Washington takeover of the health system” (which makes you wonder what they think of Medicare, a far more centralized program).  Or they peddle isolated horror stories that the fact checkers usually discover are untrue or misleading.

Thus the moment of truth, about the facts and about our purposes.

From now on, will there be more healthy skepticism about conservative claims against the ACA? Given how many times the law’s enemies have said the sky was falling when it wasn’t, will there be tougher interrogation of their next round of apocalyptic predictions?  Will their so-called alternatives be analyzed closely to see how many now-insured people would actually lose coverage under the “replacement” plans?

Perhaps more importantly, will we finally be honest about the real argument here:  Do we or do we not want to put in the effort and money it takes to guarantee all Americans health insurance?  If we do — and we should — let’s get on with doing it the best way we can.

E.J. Dionne’s     email address is ejdionne@washpost.com.

Twitter: @EJDionne.

~~~

Who Are the Koch Brothers?

 

Pierce Nahigyan

NationofChange / Op-Ed

Published: Monday 31 March 2014

 

SEE WHAT DEMOCRACY IS UP AGAINST.  Floyd

 

 

 

In progressive news sources, the Koch brothers feature prominently as the conjoined boogeymen of democracy.  Harry Reid has publicly lambasted them on the floor of the Senate for their “un-American” attempts to rig the political system in their favor and inculcate the Republican party with their “radical agenda.”

And to Senator Reid, “it is radical, at least from the middle-class perspective.”

That’s because the Koch (pronounced “Cōke”) brothers, specifically Charles and David, occupy the topmost tier of the one percent, making them thoroughly juicy targets for class warriors fed up with government kowtowing to big business.  As Rolling Stone so eloquently put it, “If the Koch brothers didn’t exist, the left would have to invent them. They’re the plutocrats from central casting.”

 

As for Senator Reid’s patriotic invective, can the Kochs really be so nefarious?  That’s a question worth answering because, statistically, the majority of Americans have no idea who they are.  A recent George Washington University survey of 1,000 likely voters discovered that 52 percent of them had never heard of Charles or David Koch.  For years even David used to joke that Koch Industries was “the biggest company you've never heard of.”

So, who are the Koch brothers and what do they do?

The Kochs Are Two of the Richest Men in America, and the World

Forbes’ most recent listing of the world’s billionaires, places Charles and David Koch at the third and fourth richest in America, sixth and seventh in the world.  They hold a combined fortune of $82 billion. 

The Kochs Own the Second Largest Private Company in America

In 2013, Koch Industries generated $115 billion in annual revenue with an estimated pretax profit margin of 10 percent. It is the second largest private company in America, after Cargill, 84 percent of which is owned by brothers Charles and David. 

The company was founded by Fred Koch and bequeathed to his eldest son, Charles, upon his death in 1967.  Today, Charles remains the Chief Executive of Koch Industries with his brother serving as the Vice-President.

Through its subsidiaries, the company is involved in several wide-ranging industries, including oil and gas, refining and chemicals, polymers and fibers, consumer products, minerals, fertilizers, forestry, and ranching.  Selected subsidiaries:

·                 Flint Hills Resources, LP has a combined crude oil capacity of over 800,000 barrels per day and produces 220 million gallons of ethanol per year. 

·                 Koch Pipeline Company, LP owns and operates 4,000 miles of pipeline throughout the country. 

·                 Koch Mineral Services, LLC is one of the largest producers and marketers of nitrogen fertilizers in the world. 

·                 Matador Cattle Company manages 425,000 acres of ranches and a population of 15,000 cattle.

·                 Georgia-Pacific, purchased by the Kochs for $21 billion in 2005, produces several brands of paper products, including: Quilted Northern toilet paper, Brawny paper towels, Vanity Fair napkins and Dixie cups.        

Koch Industries has operations in 45 states and a presence in 60 countries around the world.  It employs approximately 60,000 men and women and has no centralized pay scale.  Under the Kochs’ trademarked “Market Based Management,” workers are rewarded according to their efficiency and real value to the company.  The company has no net debt.

The Kochs Are Libertarians 

The brothers’ father, Fred Koch, studied chemical engineering at MIT and developed a more efficient oil refining process that was a boon to smaller oil companies.  The majors in the industry quickly filed lawsuits against him, 44 in all, all of which the Koch patriarch won - eventually (one ruling against him was overturned when it was discovered the judge had been bribed). 

In the 1930s, Fred Koch fled the hostile climate in the U.S. for the Soviet Union.  There he grew wealthy building refineries for Josef Stalin.  He returned to the United States after Stalin’s purges had claimed the lives of his associates, disgusted with Communism and suspicious of government in general.  He was an early supporter of the John Birch Society, a political advocacy group that opposes Communism and seeks limited government and a return to Constitutional principles.                                        

 

Charles and David Koch are their father’s sons, subscribing to the belief that “the government which governs best governs least.”  They have also been greatly influenced by Friedrich von Hayek, whose 1944 book, “The Road to Serfdom,” argues that centralized government planning ultimately leads to totalitarianism.

 

Charles explains his libertarianism in an interview with Forbes’ Daniel Fisher: “The goal has always been true democracy,” where people “can run their own lives and choose what they want to buy, choose how to spend their money....  Now in our democracy you elect somebody every two to four years and they tell you how to run your life.”

 

Though the Kochs are commonly tied to the conservative movement because of their almost unanimous bankrolling of Republican politicians, their long-term goal has always been a reduction of government.  David Koch’s support of gay marriage, his opposition to the war on drugs, and his multi-million dollar donations to New York’s fine arts are three prime examples of counter-conservatism. 

But conservatives, and the GOP, have their uses.

The Kochs Subsidize Republicans and Climate Denial

The Koch brothers’ vast network of idealogical and monetary influence is pejoratively nicknamed the “Kochtopus,” with the implication that it has its tentacles in everything.  This is not strictly true, but what money can be traced back to the Kochs can be found in a broad swath of advocacy groups, think tanks and political organizations, many of which are dedicated to blockading the Obama administration, most of which intend to loosen regulations on the Kochs’ vested industries.

For instance, Koch Industries is currently the fourteenth largest air polluter in the country.  The company has chosen to fight against environmental regulation both directly and indirectly: Greenpeace claims that between 2005 and 2008, Koch outspent ExxonMobil to fight climate-related legislation while channeling $67 million into climate-denial front groups. 

 

In 2011, the House Energy and Commerce Committee found common ground with Koch Industries and made it a stated goal to scale back the power of the Environmental Protection Agency.  This committee included 31 Republicans, 22 of which had received campaign contributions from the Kochs (total donations amounted to $279,500). Of the committee’s Democrats, five of them had also received Koch donations (totaling $32,000). 

The committee was chaired by Representative Fred Upton (R-MI), who in 2009 said, “Climate change is a serious problem that necessitates serious solutions.” One year and $20,000 of Koch donations later, Upton promised to end the “EPA chokehold” on carbon emissions.

In 2010, the Kochs’ main advocacy group, Americans for Prosperity, spent $45 million on the mid-term elections. That year, 62 of the 87 incoming House Republicans benefited from donations made by the Koch Industries’ Public Action Committee. David Koch personally attended the swearing-in ceremony of John Boehner, the Republican Speaker of the House.

 

In the lead-up to the 2014 midterms, Koch-backed organizations have already donated between $25 million and $30 million to Republican campaigns.

                  

Representative Henry Waxman, a Democrat, wasn’t afraid to voice his feelings on the subject: 

“It apparently no longer matters in Congress what health experts and scientists think [on energy].  All that seems to matter is what Koch Industries thinks....  It can be argued, however, that the Republican members of Congress in general are also wholly owned subsidiaries of Koch Industries.”

The Kochs Helped Build the Tea Party

The Tea Party has also benefited from Koch largesse, though not always to their knowledge.  Americans for Prosperity (AFP) has helped to fund Tea Party rallies and educate its members on policy since the beginning of the movement. 

In early 2009, AFP denied links to the Koch brothers and Koch Industries. Melissa Cohlmia, a spokesperson for the company, said that AFP “is an independent organization and Koch companies do not in any way direct their activities.” 

However, Peggy Venable, a member of AFP, was much more forthcoming, saying, “David’s the chairman of our board.  I’ve certainly met with [the Kochs] and I’m very appreciative of what they do.”

And David Koch has every reason to be on the board. AFP is an arm of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, itself an arm of Citizens for a Sound Economy, which split into two organizations (FreedomWorks and the AFPF) in 2004.  David Koch created Citizens for a Sound Economy in the 1980s after a failed bid for the White House on the Libertarian ticket. 

After the bid, Charles Koch said that politics “tends to be a nasty, corrupting business.” He was more “interested in advancing libertarian ideas.” 

The AFP is the most active organization dedicated to advancing libertarian ideas and IRS documents prove that David Koch donated $850,000 to the organization in its first year of filing. 

Who Are the Koch Brothers?

The answer is mundane. Though they have spent “at least $85 million on 85 right-wing think tanks and advocacy groups over the last decade and a half” and helped to write the script Republican and Tea Party politicians have followed for years, the Koch brothers are not boogeymen or even the psychopomps of the radical right.  The answer is much plainer and much simpler: They’re businessmen with a lot of names on their payroll.

 

Update 4/4/14: An earlier version of this article stated that the Koch brothers' combined fortune is $40.1 billion.  Forbes currently estimates that each brother is worth $41 billion each, thus their combined wealth is actually $82 billion. This makes them the second wealthiest family in the world, after the Walton family.

 

ABOUT Pierce Nahigyan

Pierce Nahigyan is a staff writer for NationofChange. He resides in southern California and holds a B.A. in Sociology and History from Northwestern University. Follow him @PierceNahigyan.

~~~

If the good Lord is willing and the creek don't rise, I'll talk with you again next week.

God Bless You All

&

God Bless the United States of America.

Floyd