WELCOME TO OPINIONS BASED ON FACTS (OBOF)
&
THINGS YOU MAY
HAVE MISSED (TYMHM)
YEAR ONE
YEAR TWO
YEAR THREE
YEAR FOUR
OBOF YEAR FOUR INDEX
|
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-01
|
Jan. 02, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-02
|
Jan. 09, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-03
|
Jan. 15, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-04
|
Jan. 24, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-05
|
JAN 30, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-06
|
Feb. 06, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-06 EXTRA
|
Feb. 09, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-07
|
Feb. 13, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-08
|
Feb. 21, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-09
|
Feb. 27, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-10
|
Mar. 08, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-11
|
Mar. 13, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-11 EXTRA
|
Mar. 15, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-12
|
Mar. 21, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-13
|
Mar. 29, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-14
|
Apr. 03, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-15
|
Apr. 12, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-16
|
Apr. 19, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-17
|
Apr. 26, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-18
|
May 03,
2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-19
|
May 10,
2014
|
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-20
|
May 20,
2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 21
|
May 28, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - Ho 22
|
June 10, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 23
|
June 20, 2014
|
noteOBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 24
|
July 04, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 25
|
Aug. 04, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 26
|
Aug. 25, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 27
|
Sept. 03, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 28
|
Sept. 10, 2014
|
OBOF TYMHM Vol 14 - No 29
|
Sept. 14, 2014
|
Agenda
1.
Notes from Floyd.
2.
Looks like WAR again.
3.
Wild Horses deserve better treatment.
4.
Experts warn of inevitable disaster in
from
Japan .
Couple of interesting
things has happened this week and this Sunday 9-14-14. The first makes me very unhappy. I don't know how you feel about it, but I am
totally against going into anothert WAR and that is exactly where we are headed
from what the President had to say this week when he addressed the Nation.
I think I am as sensitive as the next guy when it comes to the killing that
is going on in the middle east, but folks, these people have been fighting
forever and we aren't going to get them to stop.
Now, I know that the
point is that we are protecting ourselves from terrorists hitting us here in
our own country and I know that the President knows things that none of us can
know, but this continual war has got to stop.
If we want to provide arms to certain factions OK. But enough is enough. Of course, it will go on regardless of what I
think, but I believe there are a lot of you out there that feel the same. So much for that this week.
SECOND, Hillary just
lost my vote for President. Not because
of anything she has done and she certainly had my vote until today, Sunday
9-14-14. A few time in the past I have
mentioned that this Senator is travelling all over the country talking at
meetings and I have said that I think he is preparing to run for
President. Well, today he announced it
on Meet the Press. Senator Bernie
Sanders, Independent from Vermont
is now running for President.
I have a great respect
for this man and I think he would make an excellent President. He is well worth you time to watch him and
get to know him. He is definitely for
us. He has no fear al all of Wall Street
and he will take on the big money with vengeance. Of course, his running will make three and
the unfortunate part of this is, he could draw enough votes from Hillary, but
not enough for him to win the Presidency so that could put a Republican in the
President's Oval Office. That would be
disastrous. We'll just have to see how
it plays out, but at this point I think he has my vote.
~~~
LOOKING LIKE
ANOTHER WAR
Dear
MoveOn member,
In a major address to
the nation last night, President Obama announced that the U.S. will escalate its military
campaign against ISIS (also known as ISIL or the Islamic State). is plan seeks
to "degrade" and ultimately "destroy" ISIS in a sustained
air campaign that would include dropping more bombs on Iraq as well as possibly
beginning strikes inside Syria.1
Let's all be really
clear: President Obama is, in essence,
proposing that we launch a new U.S.
war in the Middle East . The White House
has indicated that this strategy could take upward of three years to
execute—meaning Obama would be handing the next president a new war after he
brought Bush's Iraq war to a close.2 Roughly 1,600 U.S. troops and
advisers have already been deployed to the region in recent weeks.3
Senior members of Congress are currently drafting legislation to authorize
arming Syrian rebels.4
It was especially
sobering to wake up to this news on September 11—an anniversary of so much pain
and tragedy.
It's vital that we slow down and engage in a real, full-throated
debate—including
discussion of all the alternatives we have for confronting ISIS—rather
than rushing headlong into another open-ended war in the Middle East.
There are tough
questions we should be grappling with to avoid making the same mistakes
again—questions like:
How is
the U.S. prioritizing alternatives to military force, such as halting the flow
of weapons to the region that end up in ISIS's hands and cutting off ISIS's
financing so it can't keep waging war?
How might the use of U.S. military
force undermine those alternative strategies?
What's the U.S. 's
exit strategy? What does
"defeating" ISIS look like? How will we know when to stop?
What are the potential
unintended consequences?
We haven't heard these questions asked or answered by the
president or Congress, and yet they must be deliberated. Using facts, in the open, with opportunities
for all Americans to weigh in.
We know the costs are
simply too high to get this wrong. We
know it's up to us to ask these questions, and we know it's up to us to demand
sound answers.
We'll begin by sharing
MoveOn members' questions with Congress, the president, and the media.
But we won't stop
there, because few if any decisions a country makes are as consequential as the
decision to go to war. Again, we need a full, open, fact-based national
discussion. If September 11 and
the tragic decade that followed should've taught us anything—it's that we as a
public must demand answers to hard questions before launching into war.
Thanks for all you do.
–Anna, Brian, Jo,
Maria, and the rest of the team
P.S. In case you missed
it, here's a link to the transcript of President
Obama's remarks.
Sources:
1. "Statement
by the President on ISL," The White House, September 10, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300724&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=5
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300724&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=5
2. "Destroying
ISIS May Take Years, U.S.
Officials Say," The New York Times, September 7, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300723&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=6
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300723&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=6
3. "We Already
Have Boots on the Ground in Iraq ,"
The Huffington Post, September 11, 2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300745&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=7
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300745&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=7
4. "Obama Urgently
Wants Congress to Vote on Arming Syrian Rebels," The Wire, September 10,
2014
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300746&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=9
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=300746&id=101206-18264426-URTWx6x&t=9
Want to support our work? MoveOn
Civic Action is entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate
contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And
our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Start a monthly donation here.
~~~
Wild Horses & All Wild
Life Animals
Deserve Better.
In late August, news broke that 75
captured wild horses died after being transferred from a long term holding
pasture to a corral in western Kansas .
The cause of their death? Stress, overcrowding, and rapid dietary changes.
These 75 unnecessary deaths are only the tip of the problem when it comes toAmerica 's wild
horse population. As we speak, hundreds of these majestic creatures are enduring
the terrifying round-up process, which often includes extreme long-distance running,
physical assault with electric prods and lunge whips, hoof loss, and low-flying
helicopter chases resulting in physical exhaustion and collapse.
These 75 unnecessary deaths are only the tip of the problem when it comes to
These animals deserve better. The
Bureau of Land Management—the government agency tasked with protecting and
preserving America 's
wild horses—is instead perpetuating outdated and harmful practices to control
their population. Those 75 horses in Kansas did not need to die, nor
do the countless other horses whose lives remain in jeopardy.
The ASPCA is determined to protect wild horses from this cruel, inhumane
practice, but we need your help. With
your support, we can continue our critical work to change the way the federal
government treats our herds—and put an end to these brutal methods once and for
all.
Be a voice for wild horses, and countless other animals in distress, before
their time runs out. Make a donation today.
The ASPCA recognizes that America ’s wild horses and burros
occupy a special place in our history and deserve to be protected. So why is it that the government agency in
charge of their care—the Bureau of Land Management—doesn’t seem to feel the
same way? Over the years, the BLM has
rounded up tens of thousands of our wild equines, often using cruel methods,
and shipped them to tax-funded holding facilities where they are confined for
the rest of their lives.
With more wild horses now in holding facilities (50,000)
than on the range (30,000-40,000), the situation has never been more urgent. The ASPCA is fighting to make the BLM scrap
its current management strategy and implement more humane, sustainable methods
of wild horse management, but we cannot do it alone.
With your support, we can continue our critical work to
change the way the federal government treats these majestic animals. If you’re ready to stand up for our wild
herds, and countless other threatened animals who count on us, please make a
donation today.
~~~
Experts Warn of ‘Inevitable’ Fukushima Disaster in California
Anthony
Gucciardi
Natural Society / News Report
Published:
Wednesday 3 September 2014
From
Floyd:
Use
your own judgment as to the factuality of this article. I felt that it seemed quite factual to me.
Since the catastrophic meltdown of the Fukushima nuclear power plant in March of
2011 irreparably altered the state of the planet for the known future, the
incident has been shrouded in nothing but bureaucratic cover ups and
government-backed disinformation. Now,
within our own borders, top experts turned whistleblowers are warning of a
nuclear nightmare that could surpass Fukushima
and Chernobyl
alike by leaps and bounds.
Initially listed as a Level 4 incident on the International Nuclear
Event Scale, pressure from scientists on an international level ultimately led to Fukushima’s
classification as a maximum Level 7 accident within the INES system — with some suggesting an
entirely new level was needed to describe the true impact and atrocity of the
nuclear meltdown. Now, even after witnessing what happens when a major power
plant is placed within the crosshairs of earthquake activity, a ‘new Fukushima ’ is sitting off the Central
Coast within California ’s
Diablo Canyon .
And top level nuclear experts, including a senior federal nuclear inspector
turned whistleblower, are warning that the California-based plant is a sitting radioactive
duck amid the nearby faults that have actually been found to be more dangerous
than previously thought. Back in 2008, a
new fault known as the Shoreline fault was discovered just offshore from
the Diablo Canyon nuclear facility: a discovery that truly changes
everything about the ‘safety’ of the California plant.
The whistleblower and former federal inspector of the plant, Michael
Peck, has even presented his case highlighting
the serious hazards of the plant he used to oversee to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a highly confidential report. National
organizations are already calling attention to Peck’s finding and reports, with
senior strategist Damon Moglen of Friends of the Earth International
stating:
“We agree with him that Diablo
Canyon is vulnerable to
earthquakes and must be shut down immediately. Rather than the NRC keeping this a secret,
there must be a thorough investigation with public hearings to determine
whether these reactors can operate safely.”
Yet it appears that the general public is not even being
made aware of what’s really going on, let alone the real threat that they face
on a national and international level.
As usual, the general public is not being told about ways in which they can
prepare themselves for a nuclear meltdown. Instead, government officials
were caught back in February stockpiling iodine stores in excess of 14 million doses in a
purchase order that came conveniently after reports began surfacing over
another possible meltdown at the Fukushima
plant. The doses will be enough for many officials and federal employees,
however the public will be forced to fend for themselves — and they will not
even be told about the necessity of iodine nor how they can better prepare
their families for a radioactive scenario.
The reality is that even getting a hold of low quality
potassium iodide, which I would not ever personally take over a higher quality
form of pure iodine, is becoming difficult as the population becomes aware of Fukushima ’s expansive
dangers. Many manufacturers are now stockpiling raw iodine and holding on to
the element as a form of investment with the knowledge that Fukushima may very well meltdown in the
coming months. For this reason, we have had a very hard time securing
nascent iodine formulas that many in the field of preparedness
have been stockpiling for quite some time.
But even outside out Peck’s analysis and years of experience as a nuclear
inspector at the federal level, numerous high level scientists and researchers
have been speaking out about the continuation of Fukushima’s devastating
effects and the need to further stabilize and shutdown nuclear plants along the
fault lines throughout the United States — and California is not the only
region in question. Even another
earthquake affecting Japan
could lead to the ‘evacuation of North America ’,
according to scientists David Suzuki.
In statements made during a presentation on water ecology at
the University of Alberta, award winning scientist David Suzuki went on record in saying that in the
event of another seven or above earthquake, which he says has about a 95%
chance of occurring over the next three years, it would require a complete
evacuation of North America and mean ‘bye bye Japan’.
“I have seen a paper which says that if in fact the fourth plant goes under
in an earthquake and those rods are exposed, it’s bye, bye Japan and everybody on the west coast of North America should evacuate,” he said.
Specifically speaking to the nature of Fukushima ’s
ticking time bomb, Suzuki began the breakdown of the plant’s numerous threats
with stating the very real concept that Fukushima
is perhaps the largest threat to both humanity and the planet that we face in
the immediate future.
“Fukushima is the most terrifying situation I can imagine,” he said before
delving into the issue. “Three out of the four plants were destroyed in
the earthquake and in the tsunami. The fourth one has been so badly damaged
that the fear is, if there’s another earthquake of a seven or above that, that
building will go and then all hell breaks loose… And the probability of a
seven or above earthquake in the next three years is over 95 per cent.”
And Suzuki is not the only one with major concerns. In fact, Suzuki is
perhaps one of the very few who actually received media attention due to his
celebrity status as a recipient of 16 significant academic awards and host
of the popular CBC Television program entitled ‘The Nature of Things’. Yale University
professor Charles Perrow has voiced similar concerns in a telling piece entitled ‘Fukushima Forever’, which highlights the very
serious threat of nuclear meltdown as a result of human error when it comes to
removing the plant’s spent fuel rods.
A danger that the United
States government certainly recognizes as
legitimate based on the analysis of top experts, and undoubtedly is silently
preparing for behind the scenes.
Perrow writes:
Much more serious is the danger that the spent fuel rod pool at the top of
the nuclear plant number four will collapse in a storm or an earthquake, or in
a failed attempt to carefully remove each of the 1,535 rods and safely
transport them to the common storage pool 50 meters away. Conditions in the unit 4 pool, 100 feet from
the ground, are perilous, and if any two of the rods touch it could cause a
nuclear reaction that would be uncontrollable. The radiation emitted from all these rods, if
they are not continually cool and kept separate, would require the evacuation
of surrounding areas including Tokyo .
Because of the radiation at the site the
6,375 rods in the common storage pool could not be continuously cooled; they
would fission and all of humanity will be threatened, for thousands of years.
The
Fukushima
nuclear nightmare is far from over, and even now the disaster is being
extremely mishandled and blatantly ignored by plant operator company TEPCO and
the Japanese government. In the event of
an American Fukushima within California , which would in fact be much more
devastating, there is truly no telling how much of a fatal blow would be dealt
to humanity.
ABOUT Anthony Gucciardi
Anthony is an accomplished investigative journalist whose articles have
appeared on top news sites and have been read by millions worldwide. A health activist and researcher, Anthony’s
goal is informing the public as to how they can use natural methods to
revolutionize their health, as well as exploring the behind the scenes activity
of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA.
Submitted by mbee1 on September
03, 2014 12:48pm.
The Japanese plant meltdown
The Japanese plant meltdown was not a result of the tidal wave or the
earthquake. The meltdown occurred
because the Japanese culture is top down decision making. The top were told the reactors needed to be
cooled, the equipment was sitting around that could have been sent to the
plant, one fire truck per plant would have worked which is exactly what was
sent to late. The top dithered as they did not want to ruin billions of dollars
worth of reactor with sea water waiting until the top government guy said go to
work. The result was a lot of sitting on
their rear end work and the reactors melted. Even than and now the result was zero people
killed just a lot of damage. There is no
indication the California
reactor people operate in the same manner and the reactor was designed to
withstand the possible quakes. What we
have here is hysteria from the unwashed eco freaks who hate nuclear, love solar
and wind provided the solar and wind is not in their backyard spoiling their
view. Never mind the birds killed by
both.
From
Floyd:
The
above was the only comment. We don't
know who wrote it or anything about him/her and there basis for their
position.
~~~
If the good Lord is willing and the creek don't rise, I'll talk with you again next Friday, 9-19-14.
God
Bless You All
&
God
Bless the United States of
America
Floyd
No comments:
Post a Comment