Tuesday, August 20, 2013

OBOF TYMHM & MORE PART 48


 

WELCOME TO OPINIONS  BASED  ON FACTS (OBOF)

&

THINGS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED (TYMHM)

YEAR THREE

 

Name
Published
OVERVIEW
 
OBOF & TYMHM PART 14
  Dec  18, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 15
  Jan.  02, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 16
  Jan.  08, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 16 EXTRA         
  Jan.  11, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 17
  Jan.  15, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 18
  Jan.  22, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 19
  Jan.  29, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 20
  Feb.  05, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 21
  Feb.  14, 2013 
OBOF & TYMHM PART 22
  Feb.  20, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 23
  Feb.  27, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 23 SPECIAL
  Mar.  06, 2013
 
OBOF & TYMHM PART 24
  Mar.  07, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 25
  Mar.  12, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 25-EXTRA
  Mar.  14, 2013
                          
OBOF & TYMHM PART 26
  Mar.  19, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 27
  Mar.  26, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 28
  Apr.   02, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 29
  Apr.   08, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 30
  Apr.   17, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 31
  Apr.   23, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 32
  Apr.   30, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 33
  May   07, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 34
  May   18, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 35
  May   21, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 36
  May   30, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 37
 June  05, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 38
 June  11, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 39
 June  18, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 40
 June  25, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 41
 July   02, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 42
 July   09, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 43
 July   16, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 44
 July   23, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 45
 July   30, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 46
 Aug.  06, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 47
 Aug.  14, 2013
OBOF & TYMHM PART 48
Aug.  20, 2013

 

 


IN THIS ISSUE

1.  Correction.

2.  Some opening thoughts.

3.  Corruption a plenty in the pipeline projects.

4.  Spying and more on Pipeline Resistance.

 

 

 

 

CORRECTION

 

In last week's posting, which would be part 47, for some reason that I don't know, the last sentence of the last paragraph of the second item on the agenda, was not complete.  The title of the item was "What we may expect in the coming months."  Therefore, I am printing below the entire paragraph with the last sentence complete. 

 

If that happens, it won't take long for Americans to understand that the trust fund is empty and there is no reserve fund for paying Social Security benefits.  The amount of revenue coming in each month from the payroll tax is not enough to pay full benefits.  If the government does not raise taxes, or raise the debt ceiling, so the money can borrowed, full Social Security benefits cannot be paid.  If it comes to that, perhaps the

 

public will become more receptive to what I have been saying for the past 13 years. 

 

 

SOME  OPENING  THOUGHTS.

 

By Floyd Bowman

Publisher "Opinions Based Facts."

Tuesday, August 20, 2013.

 

I have been laid up for the past few months.  As a result I have not been going to church until last Sunday.  Now, I am not a Minister, by any means, and I am not going preach.  But the sermon Sunday was so pointed toward where our country is at the preset time, that it provides a good jumping off point for this posting. 

 

"Joshua Fought the Battle of Jericho, and the Walls Came Tumbling Down."

 

We, the People, have a wall that needs a "Today Joshua" to lead us in Battle to make the Koch Brothers Wall Come Tumbling Down.  That is no joke.

 

I have not included much information in the past about the TransCanda Tar Sands Keystone XL pipeline.  Without going back and searching for it, I think I have only posted one or two articles about it in the past.  However, it is now time to bring you up to date as this is one of the most corrupt projects in our history.  The Walls of the Koch Brothers is deeply involved in this project and need to come tumbling down.

 

The two articles that follow give you up to date developments.  The second one, is reminiscent early and mid 19th century, when the good guys were after the bad guys on horse back.  Just replace the horses with cars and a little more adventurous people including undercover agents infiltrating the private meeting of the Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance camp.

 

I know for a fact that the United States, as a country, will not receive any benefits from this pipeline.  Every bit of tar sands that would be refined into diesel in Texas will be shipped to other countries.  The number of permanent job will, after the pipeline would be finished, be 30 to 40 and not much more than that doing construction, as the contractor will bring most of his own men from Canada.  Now, tell me, considering these facts, to say nothing of the enviormental damage, why on earth, would we want to approve the construction of this pipeline?

 

There is only one reason = = the large sums of money that is going to be given to a small group of people.  Now, read these two articles and you will be well informed as to what is going on.

~~~

Corruption in the Pipeline: A Timeline

Of Keystone XL Misinformation

 

Caroline Selle

DeSmogBlog / Op-Ed

Published: Sunday 18 August 2013

 

Though plagued by corruption, the Keystone XL (KXL) “zombie pipeline” refuses to die.  While firsthand accounts from front line communities in Alberta, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas have galvanized activists, the interconnected web of corporate lobbyists, oil executives, and Obama administration officials continue to push the project forward.  Thankfully, the State Department has launched an inquiry into conflicts of interest in the Keystone XL pipeline (KXL) review, specifically looking at the troubling revelations about TransCanada contractor, Environmental Resources Management (ERM Group).

Listed below is a series of selected controversies as well as the key dates around which the pipeline permitting process revolves.

2007: Documentation of health effects of tar sands extraction begins.

2008: TransCanada proposes the Keystone XL Pipeline extension.

2009: TransCanada files an application to build the KXL pipeline. Elevated occurrences of cancer are found in residents of the Fort Chipewyan community, which is located downstream from tar sands extraction sites. The Alberta government asserts there is no cause for concern.  Contrary to industry reports, the proposed KXL is revealed as an export pipeline.

 

2010: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) criticizes the first draft of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), calling the report “unduly narrow.”  The agency recommends the U.S. State Department look further into oil spill response plans, safety issues, and greenhouse gas concerns.

 

August 2011: Over a thousand peaceful protesters are arrested in front of the White House.  The final EIS is released by the State Department. It does little to address EPA's concerns.

 

September 2011: The Cornell University Global Labor Institute releases a report raising questions about TransCanada’s job creation estimates for the KXL project.   The Cornell study finds - contrary to industry claims - that the KXL pipeline will not be a major source of U.S. jobs, could increase the cost of gas in the Midwest, and is unlikely to help the U.S. on a path towards energy independence.  Additionally, the report points out flaws in an industry-based study (The Perryman Group study) claiming the pipeline will create 119,000 total jobs.  The “flawed and poorly documented study” reached the 119,000 jobs estimate by including the southern section of the Keystone XL project which has already been built.

 

October 2011: TransCanada lobbyist Paul Elliot's close ties to Hillary Clinton are documented by DeSmog, as well as those of several other lobbyists with ties to President Obama and then-secretary-of-state Hillary Clinton.  Meanwhile, TransCanada is accused of using eminent domain to secure land before the KXL is officially approved.

 

November 2011: The State Department loses thousands of comments from public hearings about the pipeline.  The department quickly announces it will seek “additional information” and delays the decision until 2013.

 

December 2011: Congressional Republicans try to speed up the review process and push the project through.  Pro-Keystone bills, riders, and amendments continue to be introduced.

 

January 2012: President Obama rejects the Keystone XL pipeline, pointing to, “the rushed and arbitrary deadline insisted on by Congressional Republicans,” which, “prevented a full assessment of the pipeline’s impact, especially the health and safety of the American people, as well as our environment.”

 

March 2012: President Obama approves the southern half of KXL. The Tar Sands Blockade begins planning a series of non-violent civil disobedience actions in response.

 

May 2012: TransCanada submits a new application for the project.

 

November 2012: Peaceful Tar Sands Blockade protesters are pepper sprayed by police.

 

February 2013: The Canadian government admits the toxins leaking into groundwater from tar sands tailings ponds are not naturally occurring.

 

March 2013: Despite the concerns of scientists, landowners, and local officials, the State Department releases a new draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) claiming the proposed KXL project is environmentally sound.  Soon, it emerges that “the study was contracted out to firms with tar sands extraction clientele.”  TransCanada hires the ERM Group, a public relations firm with ties to Big Tobacco.

 

April 2013: The EPA finds the State Department’s latest environmental review of the Keystone XL insufficient.  Reports confirm the EIS contractor greenlighted another faulty “explosive” project.

 

May 2013: The State Department’s inspector general launches an investigation into the conflicts of interest in the pipeline review process.

 

June 2013: Dents are found in sections of the Southern half of the pipeline, raising safety concerns.  Activists crawl inside the pipeline and find light seeping through.  Later, a State Department contractor is revealed as an American Petroleum Institute (API) member.  Friends of the Earth and the Checks & Balances project uncover the fact that Environmental Resources Management, Inc. (ERM), contracted to write the EIS, lied on its June 2012 contract of interest filing.   ERM claimed to have no current business ties to TransCanada, contrary to evidence.

 

July 2013: The State Department admits it doesn’t know the KXL’s exact route.  Former Obama attorney Robert Bauer is revealed as a member of law firm Perkins Coie LLP, which does legal work for TransCanada.  His wife, Anita Dunn, works for a TransCanada lobbying group. In light of the numerous scandals, public interest groups call for Secretary Kerry to throw out the State Department’s KXL review.

 

August 2013: The State Department initiates an inquiry into the flawed KXL review process. Days later, hydraulic fracturing - “fracking” - is linked to the KXL. Top players in the fracking industry and groups pushing for approval of the KXL are both linked to the ERM group.

The above list is not comprehensive, and it doesn’t include the majority of the impacts of tar sands extraction and refining.  But it should provide a clear indication of just how broken and corrupt the KXL pipeline review process is. Let's hope the Inspector General takes note during the ongoing inquiry.

~~~




 

After a week of careful planning a resistance action camp, a Tar Sands TransCanada Resistance group in Oklahoma, thought they had the element of surprise—but they would soon learn that their moves were being closely watched by law enforcement officials.

According to documents obtained by Earth Island Journal, investigators from the Bryan County Sherriff’s Department had been spying on a Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance training camp that took place from March 18 to March 22 and which brought together local landowners, Indigenous communities and environmental groups opposed to the pipeline.

On the morning of March 22 activists had planned to block the gates at the company’s strategic oil reserves in Cushing, OK, as part of the larger protest movement against TransCanada’s tar sands pipeline.  But when they showed up in the early morning hours and began unloading equipment from their vehicles they were confronted by police officers.  Stefan Warner, an organizer with Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance, says some of the vehicles en route to the protest site were pulled over even before they had reached Cushing.  He estimates that roughly 50 people would have participated—either risking arrest or providing support.  The act of nonviolent civil disobedience, weeks in the planning, was called off.

“For a small sleepy Oklahoma town to be saturated with police officers on a pre-dawn weekday leaves only one reasonable conclusion,” says Ron Seifert, an organizer with an affiliated group called Tar Sands Blockade.“  They were there on purpose, expecting something to happen.”

Seifert is exactly right.  According to documents obtained by Earth Island Journal, investigators from the Bryan County Sherriff’s Department had been spying on a Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance training camp that took place from March 18 to March 22 and which brought together local landowners, Indigenous communities and environmental groups opposed to the pipeline.

An excerpt from an official report on the “Undercover Investigation into the GPTSR Training Camp” indicates that at least two law enforcement officers from the Bryan County Sherriff’s Department infiltrated the training camp and drafted a detailed report about the upcoming protest, internal strategy and the character of the protesters themselves.

The undercover investigator who wrote the report put the tar sands opponents into five different groups:

  • Eco-activists who “truly wanted to live off the grid.”
  • Occupy members.
  • Native American activists “who blamed all forms of government for the poor state of being that most American Indians are living in.”
  • Anarchists “many wore upside down American flags.”
  • Locals from Oklahoma who “had concerns about the pipeline harming the community.”

The undercover agent’s report was obtained by Douglas Parr, an Oklahoma attorney who represented three activists (all lifelong Oklahomans) who were arrested in mid April for blockading a tar sands pipeline construction site.  “During the discovery in the Bryan county cases we received material indicating that there had been infiltration of the Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance camp by police agents,” Parr says.

At least one of the undercover investigators attended an “action planning” meeting during which everyone was asked to put their cell phones or other electronic devices into a green bucket for security reasons.  The investigator goes on to explain that he was able to obtain sensitive information regarding the location of the upcoming Cushing protest, which would mark the culmination of the week of training.“  This investigator was able to obtain an approximate location based off a question that he asked to the person in charge of media,” he wrote. He then wryly notes that, “It did not appear … that our phones had been tampered with.”

The memo also states that organizers at the meeting went to great lengths not to give police any cause to disrupt the gathering.  The investigator writes: “We were repeatedly told this was a substance free camp.  No drug or alcohol use would be permitted on the premises and always ask permission before touching anyone.  Investigators were told that we did not need to give the police any reason to enter the camp.”  They were also given a pamphlet that instructed any agent of TransCanada, the FBI or other law enforcement agency to immediately notify the event organizers.

 

The infiltration of the Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance action camp and pre-emption of the Cushing protest is part of a larger pattern of government surveillance of tar sands protesters. According to other documents obtained by Earth Island Journal under an Open Records Act request, Department of Homeland Security staff has been keeping close tabs on pipeline opponents—and routinely sharing that information with TransCanada, and vice versa. 

In March, TransCanada gave a briefing on corporate security to a Criminal Intelligence Analyst with the Oklahoma Information Fusion Center, the state level branch of Homeland Security.  The conversation took place just as the action camp was getting underway. The following day, Diane Hogue, the Center’s Intelligence Analyst, asked TransCanada to review and comment on the agency’s classified situational awareness bulletin. Michael Nagina, Corporate Security Advisor for TransCanada, made two small suggestions and wrote, “With the above changes I am comfortable with the content.”

Then, in an email to TransCanada on March 19—the second day of the action camp—Hogue seems to refer to the undercover investigation taking place.“  Our folks in the area say there are between 120-150 participants,” Hogue wrote in an email to Nagina. The Oklahoma Information Fusion Center declined to comment for this story.

It is unclear if the information gathered at the training camp was shared directly with TransCanada.  However, the company was given access to the Fusion Center’s situational awareness bulletin just a few days before the Cushing action was scheduled to take place.

In an emailed statement, TransCanada spokesperson Shawn Howard did not directly address the Tar Sands Resistance training camp.  Howard described law enforcement as being interested in what the company has done to prepare for activities designed to “slow approval or construction” of the pipeline project. “When we are asked to share what we have learned or are prepared for, we are there to share our experience—not direct law enforcement,” he wrote.

At least one of the investigators seemed to have gained the trust of the direct action activists.

The evidence of heightened cooperation between TransCanada and law enforcement agencies in Oklahoma and Texas comes just over a month after it was revealed that the company had given a PowerPoint presentation on corporate security to the FBI and law enforcement officials in Nebraska. TransCanada also held an “interactive session” with law enforcement in Oklahoma City about the company’s security strategy in early 2012.  In their PowerPoint presentation, TransCanada employees suggested that district attorneys should explore “state or federal anti-terrorism laws” in prosecuting activists.  They also included profiles of key organizers and a list of activists previously arrested for acts of nonviolent civil disobedience in Texas and Oklahoma.

In addition to TransCanada’s presentation, a representative of Nebraska’s Homeland Security Fusion Center briefed attendees on an “intelligence sharing role/plan relevant to the pipeline project.”  This is likely related to the Homeland Security Information Sharing Network, which provides public and private sector partners as well as law enforcement access to sensitive information.

The earlier cache of documents, first released to the press by Bold Nebraska, an environmental organization opposed to the pipeline, shows that TransCanada has established close ties with state and federal law enforcement agencies along the proposed pipeline route.  For example, in an exchange with FBI agents in South Dakota, TransCanada’s Corporate Security Advisor, Michael Nagina, jokes that, “I can be the cure for insomnia so sure hope you can still attend!”  Although they were unable to make the Nebraska meeting, one of the agents responded, “Assuming approval of the pipeline, we would like to get together to discuss a timeline for installation through our territory.”

The new documents also provide an interesting glimpse into the revolving door between state law enforcement agencies and the private sector, especially in areas where fracking and pipeline construction have become big business.  One of the individuals providing information to the Texas Department of Homeland Security’s Intelligence and Counterterrorism Division is currently the Security Manager at Anadarko Petroleum, one of the world’s largest independent oil and natural gas exploration and production companies.  In 2011, at a natural gas industry stakeholder relations conference, a spokesperson for Anadarko compared the anti-drilling movement to an “insurgency” and suggested that attendees download the US Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Manual.

 

The infiltration of the Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance action camp and pre-emption of the Cushing protest is part of a larger pattern of government surveillance of tar sands protesters.

LC Wilson, the Anadarko Security Manager shown by the documents to be providing information to the Texas Fusion Center, is more than just a friend of law enforcement.  From 2009 to 2011 he served as Regional Commander of the Texas Department of Public Safety, which oversees law enforcement statewide.  Wilson began his career with the Department of Public Safety in 1979 and was named a Texas Ranger—an elite law enforcement unit—in 1988, eventually working his way up to Assistant Chief.  Such connections would be of great value to a corporation like Anadarko, which has invested heavily in security operations.

In an email to Litto Paul Bacas, a Critical Infrastructure Planner—and former intelligence analyst—with Texas Homeland Security, Wilson, using his Anadarko address, writes, “we find no intel specific for Texas.  There is active recruitment for directed action to take place in Oklahoma as per article. I will forward any intel we come across on our end, especially if it concerns Texas.”  The article he was referring to was written by a member of Occupy Denver calling on all “occupiers and occupy networks” to attend the Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance training camp.

Wilson is not the only former law enforcement official on Anadarko’s security team; Jeffrey Sweetin, the company’s Regional Security Manager, was a special agent with the Drug Enforcement Administration for more than 20 years heading up its Rocky Mountain division.  At Anadarko, according to Sweetin’s profile on Linkedin, his responsibilities include “security program development” and “law enforcement liaison.”

Other large oil and gas companies have recruited local law enforcement to fill high-level security positions.  In 2010, long-time Bradford County Sheriff Steve Evans resigned to take a position as senior security officer for Chesapeake Energy in Pennsylvania.  Evans was one of a handful of gas industry security directors to receive intelligence bulletins compiled by a private security firm and distributed by the Pennsylvania Department of Homeland Security.  Bradford County happens to be ground zero for natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale, with more active wells than any other county in the state.  In addition to Evans, several deputies of the Bradford County Sheriff’s office have worked for Chesapeake—through a private contractor, TriCorps Security—as “off-duty” security personnel. TransCanada has also come to rely on off duty police officers to patrol construction sites and protest camps, raising questions about whose interests the sworn officers are serving.

Of course for corporations like TransCanada and Anadarko having law enforcement on their side—or in their pocket—is more than just a good business move.  It gives them access to classified information and valuable intelligence—essential weapons in any counterinsurgency campaign.




Protect Clean Air, Clean Water, Clean Food

~~~

If the good Lord is willing and the creek don't rise, I'll talk with you again next Tuesday, August, 27, 2013

 

God Bless You All

&

God Bless the United States of America.

Floyd

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment