Saturday, April 19, 2014

OBOF TYMHM & MORE PART 14-16


 WELCOME TO OPINIONS  BASED  ON FACTS (OBOF)

&

THINGS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED (TYMHM)

YEAR ONE

YEAR TWO

YEAR THREE

YEAR FOUR

 

OBOF YEAR FOUR INDEX
 
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-01
Jan. 02, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-02
Jan. 09, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-03
Jan. 15, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-04
Jan. 24, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-05
JAN 30, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-06
Feb. 06, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-06 EXTRA
Feb. 09, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-07
Feb. 13, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-08
Feb. 21, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-09
Feb. 27, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-10
Mar. 08, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-11
Mar. 13, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-11    EXTRA
Mar. 15, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-12
Mar.  21, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-13
Mar.  29, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-14
Apr.  03, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-15
Apr.  12, 2014
OBOF TYMHM PART 14-16
Apr.  19, 2014

 

Agenda

 

1.  For what it may be worth.


3.  Obamacare Enrollment Hits 8 Million.

 

 

 

 

FOR WHAT IT MAY BE WORTH

FROM FLOYD

 

 

I have been, and am, literally reading hundreds of articles, news reports from all over the media and from all this information, good, bad, and ridiculous the sky is falling in and the world will disappear  at any minute.

Honestly!  Folks, all of the above is being laid at the door of Barack Obama.  One resource is now saying that the President know what has happened to flight 370 and won't tell.  Everything is his fault.  A poll was taken as to how many think the President knows what happened to flight 370.  It showed that 82% believes he knows and 18 % thinks he doesn't.


 

Now, I have been a strong support of the President, but I have been very disappointed in many of the things he is doing and supporting, but he isn't the most dangerous President we have ever had, as was in one article I read this week.

 

Probably like you, I get a lot of campaign mail.  Ninety per cent is from Republicans.  That by itself shows what the Koch Brothers money is doing.  More importantly though, is the statements that are included in these mailing.  They are mostly, what I call, generic.  In other words they are just negative statements, mainly about the President, that wouldn't hold as much water as a pail of water with shot gun holes in it.

 

For example, I recently received a letter asking me to fill out a survey and send money back with my completed survey.  It was from the Heritage Foundation which is known to be one of the elite operations of the Koch Brothers.  This letter is four pages long and some of the statements are good examples of what I mean about generic statements.  They are the kind that many people eat up. 

 

"If you've been open about you conservative beliefs, you may have been targeted by the IRS.  You may have been unfairly audited."  "If you're a Tea Party or small government group, the IRS may have tried to put you out of business."

 

"If you own a business, you might be damaged by any number of government actions - forced to downsize because of the crushing burdens mandated by ObamaCare ... raided by dozens of heavily armed federal agents because you were suspected of violating an ambiguous law ... or shut down by EPA regulations whose benefits have not been proven."

 

I counted eleven such statements in this letter.  People turn these kinds of statements into reality that they are happening when there is not claim at all that it is happening.  It is all conjecture, but it gets votes if it isn't countered.  This is what we are up against if we want to win this years elections.

 

~~~


 

Antitrust in the New Gilded Age


Robert Reich

NationofChange / Op-Ed

Published: Friday 18 April 2014

 

We’re in a new gilded age of wealth and power similar to the first gilded age when the nation’s antitrust laws were enacted.  Those laws should prevent or bust up concentrations of economic power that not only harm consumers but also undermine our democracy — such as the pending Comcast acquisition of Time-Warner. 

In 1890, when Republican Senator John Sherman of Ohio urged his congressional colleagues to act against the centralized industrial powers that threatened America, he did not distinguish between economic and political power because they were one and the same.  The field of economics was then called “political economy,” and inordinate power could undermine both. “If we will not endure a king as a political power,” Sherman thundered, “we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life.”

 

Shortly thereafter, the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed by the Senate 52 to 1, and moved quickly through the House without dissent.  President Harrison signed it into law July 2, 1890.

In many respects America is back to the same giant concentrations of wealth and economic power that endangered democracy a century ago.  The floodgates of big money have been opened even wider in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in “Citizen’s United vs. FEC” and its recent “McCutcheon" decision.

Seen in this light, Comcast’s proposed acquisition of Time-Warner for $45 billion is especially troublesome — and not just because it may be bad for consumers.  Comcast is the nation’s biggest provider of cable television and high-speed Internet service; Time Warner is the second biggest.


Last week, Comcast’s executives descended on Washington to persuade regulators and elected officials that the combination will be good for consumers.  They say it will allow Comcast to increase its investments in cable and high-speed Internet, and encourage rivals to do so as well. 

Opponents argue the combination will give consumers fewer choices, resulting in higher cable and Internet bills.  And any company relying on Comcast’s pipes to get its content to consumers (think Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, or any distributor competing with Comcast’s own television network, NBCUniversal) also will have to pay more — charges that will also be passed on to consumers.

I think the opponents have the better argument.  Internet service providers in America are already too concentrated, which is why Americans pay more for Internet access than the citizens of almost any other advanced nation. 

Some argue that the broadband market already has been carved up into a cartel, so blocking the acquisition would do little to bring down prices.  One response would be for the Federal Communications Commission to declare broadband service a public utility and regulate prices. 

 

But Washington should also examine a larger question beyond whether the deal is good or bad for consumers: Is it good for our democracy?

We haven’t needed to ask this question for more than a century because America hasn’t experienced the present concentration of economic wealth and power in more than a century.

But were Senator John Sherman were alive today he’d note that Comcast is already is a huge political player, contributing $1,822,395 so far in the 2013-2014 election cycle, according to data collected by the Center for Responsive Politics — ranking it 18th of all 13,457 corporations and organizations that have donated to campaigns since the cycle began. 

Of that total, $1,346,410 has gone individual candidates, including John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, and Harry Reid; $323,000 to Leadership PACs; $278,235 to party organizations; and $261,250 to super PACs.

Last year, Comcast also spent $18,810,000 on lobbying, the seventh highest amount of any corporation or organization reporting lobbying expenditures, as required by law.

Comcast is also one of the nation’s biggest revolving doors. Of its 107 lobbyists, 86 worked in government before lobbying for Comcast.  Its in-house lobbyists include several former chiefs of staff  to Senate and House Democrats and Republicans as well as a former commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission.

Nor is Time-Warner a slouch when it comes to political donations, lobbyists, and revolving doors.  It also ranks near the top.

When any large corporation wields this degree of political influence it drowns out the voices of the rest of us, including small businesses.  The danger is greater when such power is wielded by media giants because they can potentially control the marketplace of ideas on which a democracy is based.

When two such media giants merge, the threat is extreme.  If film-makers, television producers, directors, and news organizations have to rely on Comcast to get their content to the public, Comcast is able to exercise a stranglehold on what Americans see and hear. 

Remember, this is occurring in America’s new gilded age — similar to the first one in which a young Teddy Roosevelt castigated the “malefactors of great wealth, who were “equally careless of the working men, whom they oppress, and of the State, whose existence they imperil.”

It’s that same equal carelessness toward average Americans and toward our democracy that ought to be of primary concern to us now.  Big money that engulfs government makes government incapable of protecting the rest of us against the further depredations of big money.

After becoming President in 1901, Roosevelt used the Sherman Act against forty-five giant companies, including the giant Northern Securities Company that threatened to dominate transportation in the Northwest. William Howard Taft continued to use it, busting up the Standard Oil Trust in 1911. 

In this new gilded age, we should remind ourselves of a central guiding purpose of America’s original antitrust law, and use it no less boldly.    

~~~

Obamacare Enrollment Hits 8 Million

Tara Culp- Ressler

Think Progress / News Investigation

Published: Friday 18 April 2014

 

 

President Obama announced on Thursday that 8 million people have signed up for plans through Obamacare’s new insurance exchanges.  Although March 31 was originally the final deadline to enroll in Obamacare, administration officials extended the open enrollment period until April 15 to accommodate the people who may have struggled to complete their applications due to technological issues.

 

Just over two weeks ago, the administration announced that Obamacare enrollment had reached 7.1 million — surpassing expectations after HealthCare.gov’s rocky rollout in October. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) originally projected seven million enrollments, and revised that figure down to six million after persistent website glitches plagued the exchange websites in the fall.  But sign-ups picked up steam as the end neared.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          The 8 million figure includes 3.7 million sign-ups between March 1 and April 15.  This thing is working,” Obama said.

 

The administration has not yet released more detailed data about the people who have signed up for new plans, so it’s unclear how many were previously uninsured and how many have paid their first premium.  Even without further numbers from the White House, however, several recent outside reports suggest that the health reform law is on solid footing.

 

Polling from Gallup released this week found that Obamacare may be having an even bigger impact on the uninsurance rate than initially expected, suggesting that about 12 million previously uninsured Americans have gained coverage since the fall.  That places the uninsurance rate at its lowest point since 2008.  According to Gallup’s estimations, about half of the Americans who have gained insurance for the first time this year say they got their coverage through Obamacare’s marketplaces. Other people gaining coverage could have gotten it through the expansion of the Medicaid program, or by signing up directly with an insurer.

 

And despite concerns that Obamacare wouldn’t be able to recover from HealthCare.gov’s disastrous rollout, several major insurers say they’re optimistic about the law, and eager to continue offering plans on the new marketplaces during the next open enrollment period.  Insurance companies like UnitedHealth Group, Kaiser Permanente, Molina Healthcare, and Wellmark are interested in maintaining their presences on the state-level exchanges, and some are considering expanding, according to Politico.

 

Although there have been some ominous predictions that Obamacare will cause health insurance premiums to skyrocket, the statisticians working with insurers to project next year’s insurance premium rates report that there won’t be double digit hikes. While there will likely be variation in individual costs, officials from the Society of Actuaries expect mostly modest premium increases, saying “the double-rate increases we’ve been hearing are probably exaggerated.”

 

Some of the concerns over rising premiums stemmed from the assumption that there won’t be enough young and healthy people in the exchanges to balance out the older and sicker enrollees. But those fears may be unfounded. Obama announced on Thursday that 35 percent of enrollees are under the age of 35, and 28 percent are between the ages of 18 and 34. Since previous estimates had skewed older, that indicates a rush of younger people signed up at the last minute. Those numbers fall in line with the experience that Massachusetts has when it enacted similar health care reforms in 2006. Young peoplegradually signed up over time, and by the end of the enrollment period, about 28 percent of Massachusetts enrollees were between the ages of 19 and 34.

However, not everyone is equally sharing in the gains under Obamacare’s coverage expansion.  The president noted that, thanks to Republican governors’ continued resistance to the optional Medicaid expansion, an estimated 5.7 million low-income people will remain uninsured in 2016.

~~~

If the good Lord is willing and the creek don't rise, I'll try to talk with you again next week, hopefully a little earlier in the week.

God Bless You All

&

God Bless the United States of America.

Floyd

No comments:

Post a Comment