Tuesday, November 13, 2012

OBOF TYMHM & MORE PART 9


 

WELCOME TO OPINIONS  BASED  ON FACTS (OBOF)

&

THINGS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED (TYMHM)

 

Name
Published
OVERVIEW
Dec. 28, 2010
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 1
Dec. 30, 2010
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 2
Jan. 10, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 3
Jan. 17, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 4
Jan. 24, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 5
Jan. 31, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 6
Feb. 07, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 7
Feb. 14, 2011
SPECIAL ISSUE
Feb. 18, 2011
 SOCIAL SECURITY PART 8
Feb. 21, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 9
Mar. 01, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY PART 10
Mar. 07, 2011
SS & MORE PART 1
Mar. 14, 2011
SS & MORE PART 1A
Mar. 21, 2011
SS & MORE PART 2
Mar. 25, 2011
SS & MORE PART 3
 Mar. 29, 2011
SS & MORE PART 4
 Apr. 04, 2011
SS & MORE PART 5
 Apr. 11, 2011
SS & MORE PART 6
 Apr. 18, 2011
SS & MORE PART 7
 Apr. 25, 2011
SS & MORE PART 7A     
 Apr. 29, 2011
SS & MORE PART 8
 May 02, 2011
SS & MORE PART 9
 May 09, 2011
 SS & MORE PART 10
 May 16, 2011
SS & MORE PART 11
 May 24, 2011
SS & MORE PART 12
 Jun. 06, 2011
SS & MORE PART 13
 Jun. 20, 2011
SS & MORE PART 14
July  05, 2011
SS & MORE PART 14A
July  18, 2011
SS & MORE PART 15
July  19, 2011
SS & MORE PART 16
Aug. 03, 2011
SS & MORE PART 17
Aug. 15, 2011
SS & MORE PART 18
Aug. 29, 2011
SS & MORE PART 19
Sept. 12, 2011
SS & MORE PART 20
Sept. 26, 2011
SS & MORE PART 21
Oct.   10, 2011
SS & MORE PART 22
Oct.   24, 2011
SS & MORE PART 22 EXTRA
Nov.  04, 2011
SS & MORE PART 23
Nov.  07, 2011
SS & MORE PART 24
Nov.  21, 2011
SS & MORE PART 25
Dec.  05, 2011
SS & MORE PART 26
Dec.  19, 2011
SS & MORE PART 27
JAN.  03, 2012
SS & MORE PART 27A
JAN.  05, 2012
SS & MORE PART 28
JAN.  17, 2012
SS & MORE PART 29
JAN.  31, 2012
SS & MORE PART 30
 Feb.  14, 2012
SS & MORE PART CL1
 Feb.  21, 2012
SS & MORE PART 30 EXTRA
 Feb.  23, 2012
SS & MORE PART 31
 Feb.  28, 2012
SS & MORE PART CL2 - 59
 Mar.  06, 2012
SS & MORE PART 31 EXTRA
 Mar.  07, 2012
SS & MORE PART 32
 Mar.  13, 2012
SS & MORE PART CL3 - 1
 Mar.  20, 2012
SS & MORE PART 32 EXTRA
 Mar.  24, 2012
SS & MORE PART 33
 Apr.  10, 2012
SS & MORE PART CL 4 - 2
 Apr.  17, 2012
SS & MORE PART 34
 Apr.  24, 2012
SS & MORE PART CL5 - 49
 May  01, 2012
SS & MORE PART 35
 May  09, 2012
SS & MORE PART CL6 - 19
 May  15, 2012
SS & MORE PART 35 EXTRA
 May  18, 2012
..   SS & MORE PART 36
 May  22, 2012
SS & MORE PART 36 EXTRA
 May  25, 2012
SS & MORE PART 36
 
                       EXTRA II
 June 01, 2012
SS & MORE PART 37
 June 05. 2012
SS & MORE PART 37 EXTRA
 June 07, 2012
SS & MORE PART 38
 June 12, 2012
SS & MORE PART 39
 June 19, 2012
SS & MORE PART 40
 June 26, 2012
SS & MORE PART 41
 July  03, 2012
SS & MORE PART 42
 July  10, 2012
SS & MORE PART 43
 July  17, 2012
SS & MORE PART 44
 July  24,2012
SS & MORE PART 45
 July  31, 2012
SS & MORE PART 46
 Aug. 07, 2012
SS & MORE PART 46 EXTRA
 Aug. 09, 2012
SS & MORE PART 47
 Aug. 14, 2012
SS & MORE PART 48
 Aug. 21, 2012
SS & MORE PART 49
 Aug. 28, 2012
SS & MORE PART 50
Sept. 04. 2012
SS & MORE PART 51
Sept. 11. 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 1
Sept. 20, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 2              
Sept. 24,2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 3
Oct.  02, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 4
Oct.  04, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 5
Oct.  09, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 6
Oct.  18, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 7
Oct.  24, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 8
Oct.  31, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 8 EXTRA                                           
Nov. 04, 2012
OBOF & TYMHM PART 9
Nov. 13, 2012

 

 

IN THIS ISSUE

 

1.  Re-elected.

2.  What about the disappointment.

3.  Now the President needs more than ever.

4.  Young voters turn out.

5.  The next economy.

RE-ELECTED

 

WHO?

 

PRESIDENT

OBAMA,

OF COURSE

 

~~~

I'M HAPPY

 

I'M THRILLED

 

I'M EXCITED

 

I'M DISAPPOINTED

 

THE FOURTH WORD DOESN'T FIT WITH THE THOUGHT

OF THE OTHER THREE.

DOES IT.

 

WELL, it's been a very gratifying election.  Many things to really be happy, thrilled, and excited about.  To me, one of the greatest developments, is the fact, that all the big billionaires and millionaires, with all their millions of dollars, were not able to overcome all of us grassroots people. We got our President re-elected by a 303 to 206 electoral vote margin.  That does not include Florida yet, as it is still to close to call.  That doesn't really matter, because if all of Florida's votes, of 29, went to Romney, he would still be far short of the 270 needed.

 

There were a number of congressional races that were won despite tremendous amounts of money thrown in the direction of the Republican candidate.  For example, Tammy Baldwin (D) for Senate from Wisconsin and Elizabeth Warren (D) for Senate from Massachusetts, both had tough races and really helped to strengthen our position in the Senate.

 

Two of the hottest Senate races in the country were in Ohio and Vermont.  The most money spent against an incumbent, was in Ohio against Sherrod Brown (D), but the grassroots from all over the country came together, as he is one of the strongest advocates for the middle class and for preserving Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.  The same can be said for Bernie Sanders of Vermont (I).  The second largest amount of outside money was spent trying to defeat Bernie, but again like Sherrod, those of us of the grassroots class, stood up and beat the billionaires down.

 

Sherrod Brown entered Federal service in the House of Representatives in 1993, where he served 7- two year terms. He became a U. S. Senator in 2007.  This, of course, is the beginning of his second term as a U. S. Senator.  He is 60 years old and he is very energetic.

 

Bernie Sanders entered Federal service in the House of Representatives in 1990, where he served 8-two year terms.  He became a U. S. Senator, the same year Sherrod Brown did, in 2007.  He, as Brown, is now beginning his second term in the Senate.  He is 71 and a real fire ball.

 

In my opinion, both of these men are true progressive Senators and do fight hard for the Middle class.  I have watched them both for the past three years and they both have their head on straight about our country and our people, the 99%ers,

 

~~~

 

WHAT ABOUT THE

 DISAPPOINTMENT?

 

 

The disappointment is probably evident to most of you.  While we did gain some seats in, both the House and the Senate, we didn't gain enough to have a Democratic Congress.  SO, the President, is in the same situation as in his first term, or is he?

 

Not quite so fast, while he doesn't have a full Democratic Congress behind him, he does have the experience of the first two years of his first term.  If you recall, he spent those two years trying to compromise with a Congress whose agenda was to be sure he would not have a second term.

 

The second half of his first term, he began to see that the soft approach was not going to work, but it was too late to get the important legislation enacted.  The Republicans were dug in and were not going to give him anything.

 

Despite this set of circumstances, he was able to bring back 5.3 million new jobs in 33 months, get Affordable Health Care Act passed, 18 tax reductions for small business, passed "Don't Ask Don't Tell," and about 90 other Executive Order matters into law, that Congress couldn't stop.  So, what can we expect in his second term?  For starters, he meets with Labor Leaders, today Tuesday.  On Wednesday the 14th, he meets with the nation's Business Leaders and on Thursday the 15th, he meets with the Congressional Leadership of both parties.

 

The main point, however, is that I think he has no intention of starting off easy.  I believe, he is going to be strong and, as he has already said, with regard to meeting the deficit problems we face with the upcoming fiscal cliff "I will not let the deficit be totally paid on the backs of students, seniors and the middle class, while those making $250,000 a year or more, pay not a dime more in taxes.  I won't do that."

 

~~~

 

AND NOW, THE PRESIDENT NEEDS US, AS MUCH AS DURING THE ELECTION CYCLE.

 

Considering what I have said above, the President and the Democrats in the House and in the Senate are going to need all our support, during the next four years, as much as during the election cycle.  We all need to keep track of developments in Washington and write, phone and e-mail our Representatives, Senators, and President, as to our backing.  When certain important developments occur, we must flood their offices with our thoughts and support. 

 

This is as important as getting them elected.  Our job is not over.  While they may not need as much money as during the election, although I know they are going to need that too, they still need to hear from us so we can have an influence on what happens in Washington.

 

REMEMBER, IN JUST ONE YEAR, OR ACTUALLY RIGHT NOW, THE NEXT ELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE HOUSE WILL BE UNDERWAY.  THIS WILL GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET A DEMOCRAT CONGRESS FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS OF THE PRESIDENT'S TERM.  OUR REP's ARE GOING TO NEED MONEY FOR THAT, SO START SAVING YOUR PENNIES AND LET THE GRASSROOTS CLASS DO IT AGAIN.

 

~~~

YOUNG VOTERS TURNED OUT FOR

OBAMA JUST LIKE IN 2008.

 

ZO CARPENTER

The Nation / News Report

Published Thursday November 8, 2012

 

Add this to the list of bad bets the GOP placed this year: that young Americans’ support for Barack Obama, and their interest in politics in general, was tenuous enough to break—and that it could be broken through discouragement and voter suppression, rather than by specific appeals to their concerns.

Twenty-two to 23 million Americans under 30 voted yesterday, with a turnout rate of at least 49 percent among eligible voters. That figure is comparable with the estimate at this time in 2008, which later rose to 52 percent as final results trickled in. Nearly a fifth of all voters were under 30 (19 percent, up from 18 percent in 2008), and they voted for Obama by a twenty-three-point m+argin, 60 to 37 percent.

 

The president could not have won without them. An analysis from the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) suggests that eighty of Obama’s electoral votes depended on the support of young voters. If Romney had captured just half of the youth vote in Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania and Florida, those states would have swung red, and those eighty votes would have given Romney the presidency.

 

 “I was pretty much prepared to sound some kind of alarm,” CIRCLE’s Peter Levine said this morning, referring to projections that youth participation would drop off precipitously in this election. While 2008 was designated as the ‘year of the youth vote,’ the showing from millennials this year is even more striking given the hurdles young voters had to overcome. Confusion spread by voter ID laws, hours-long waits at the polls, a presidential fight waged in a fraction of the states and shadowed by dark money, and the long slog of the economic recovery, all could have kept young voters from the polls. “They had a choice,” said Rock the Vote’s president Heather Smith, “to opt out because of frustration. But they understood that people trump money.”

And millennials didn’t just show up to vote for the president. In California, decidedly not in play as a swing state, young voters made up 27 percent of the electorate, helping to legalize marijuana. Elizabeth Warren won her senate seat with the support of over 60 percent of young voters in Massachusetts. Ballot initiatives legalizing gay marriage passed in Maryland, Maine and Washington.

“This voting block can no longer be an afterthought to any political party or campaign,” said Smith, calling strong youth participation ‘the new normal” in American politics. Since 2004, about half of all young adults have voted in presidential elections, while through the 1990s turnout hovered near 40 percent.

By 2020, millennials will account for nearly 40 percent of the electorate. They are more diverse than any previous generation, and the single moniker belies the span of their political concerns. These voters are also coming of age in a time when support for gay marriage is not radical but a matter of basic fairness; when a black president is elected not once but twice; and when strong women win the battles for seats in Congress. It wasn’t just that the president had a stronger ground game, four years of pro-youth policy and an emotional foundation to run on. It’s that Republicans across the board support policies that most young Americans do not.

 

As I reported last month, the hand-wringing over generational apathy was in part a misreading of criticism from young citizens who will be pushing for a more progressive second term from Obama. Today, it’s their votes that matter. But tomorrow, and for years to come, their criticism may prove more valuable. These young voters are the “stubborn thing[s]” the president invoked early this morning in his acceptance speech, who insist “despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us.”

~~~

Next Economy: Why He Must Take This Opportunity to Reframe the Economic Debate


Robert Reich


NationofChange/ op - ed


Published Thursday November 8, 2012


 

When the applause among Democrats and recriminations among Republicans begin to quiet down — probably within the next few days — the President will have to make some big decisions. The biggest is on the economy.

His victory and the pending “fiscal cliff” give him an opportunity to recast the economic debate. Our central challenge, he should say, is not to reduce the budget deficit. It’s to create more good jobs, grow the economy, and widen the circle of prosperity.

The deficit is a problem only in proportion to the overall size of the economy. If the economy grows faster than its current 2 percent annualized rate, the deficit shrinks in proportion. Tax receipts grow, and the deficit becomes more manageable.

But if economic growth slows – as it will, if taxes are raised on the middle class and if government spending is reduced when unemployment is still high – the deficit becomes larger in proportion. That’s the austerity trap Europe finds itself in. We don’t want to go there.

This is why January’s so-called “fiscal cliff” — $600 billion in automatic spending cuts and tax increases – is so dangerous. It’s too much deficit reduction, too soon. Tax increases on the middle class would reduce their spending just when the economy needs that spending in order to keep growing, and cuts in government’s own spending would make the problem worse.

 

If we go over the fiscal cliff, we’re in another recession. Don’t just take my word for it. That’s also the view of the Congressional Budget Office and most private economic forecasters.

The way to ensure continued growth is to continue the President’s payroll tax cut and extend the Bush tax cuts for income under $250,000, and continue government spending.

The way to increase growth is to permanently exempt the first $20,000 of income from the payroll tax and make up for lost revenues by raising the ceiling on income subject to it (that ceiling is now $110,100). And increase government spending — especially on critical public investments like education, job training, and infrastructure.

Any “grand bargain” on deficit reduction should contain a starting trigger — and that trigger should be when the economy can safely be assumed to be back on track. I’d make that trigger 6 percent unemployment and 3 percent economic growth for two consecutive quarters, and make sure that trigger was in the legislation.

The President needs to make it clear to the public that the only way we can achieve a better economy is through a larger and more buoyant middle class. If we continue lurching toward widening inequality and ever more concentrated income and wealth at the top, the vast middle class – as well as all those who aspire to join it – won’t have the purchasing power to grow the economy and create more jobs.

That’s why taxes must be increased on the wealthy, and the proceeds used to reduce the deficit over the long term, extend and enlarge the Earned Income Tax Credit (a wage subsidy for lower-income workers), and invest in education.

The President’s victory doesn’t give him a clear mandate to achieve any of this – the margin of victory was too small, and he didn’t tell the American electorate explicitly that his priority would be creating jobs and growing the middle class instead of reducing the deficit.

But his victory gives him the attention of the nation and the authority that comes with having won reelection. It therefore gives him the opportunity to recast the economic debate. The upcoming fiscal cliff makes it particularly urgent he do so quickly.

~~~

If the good Lord is willing and the creek don't rise, I'll talk with you again next Tuesday November 20, 2012.

 

God Bless You All

&

God Bless the United States of America.

Floyd

 

No comments:

Post a Comment